<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Library search as &#8217;search portal&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/</link>
	<description>Gone to Croatoan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Auswahlbibliographie &#8222;Katalog 2.0&#8243; &#171; Katalog 2.0</title>
		<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>Auswahlbibliographie &#8222;Katalog 2.0&#8243; &#171; Katalog 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibwild.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>[...] Jonathan: Library search as a &#8222;search portal&#8220;. Oktober [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jonathan: Library search as a &#8222;search portal&#8220;. Oktober [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rab</title>
		<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/#comment-2937</link>
		<dc:creator>rab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibwild.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-2937</guid>
		<description>We took a local index approach and have included some issues noted in the article.
We have (as a start) included
- our local catalog
- journal holdings e and print
- Open Access texts wordwide (with geoscientific subjects)
- some local bibliographies
- and RSS feed information on contents of current journal issues

See
http://waesearch.kobv.de/

It is Lucene as a technical base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We took a local index approach and have included some issues noted in the article.<br />
We have (as a start) included<br />
- our local catalog<br />
- journal holdings e and print<br />
- Open Access texts wordwide (with geoscientific subjects)<br />
- some local bibliographies<br />
- and RSS feed information on contents of current journal issues</p>
<p>See<br />
<a href="http://waesearch.kobv.de/" rel="nofollow">http://waesearch.kobv.de/</a></p>
<p>It is Lucene as a technical base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrochkind</title>
		<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>jrochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibwild.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>Response time is definitely a huge issue. That most of our software fails at---even our OPACs that DO have local indexes generally have ridiculously slow response times. 

It&#039;s definitely an issue with broadcast search. I am trying to convince my fellow librarians at my place of work that if a particular resource being searched is so slow that it brings down the response time of the overall broadcast search, it should be dropped from the default search sets--no matter how useful it is. Tell the vendor to make it faster. They aren&#039;t agreeing. 

While the fastest broadcast search is still going to be slower than the fastest local index search, our current broadcast search is far from &#039;the fastest&#039;. I think broadcast search can probably be fast enough. Some sources in my broadcast search return in a couple seconds. Others take 10 seconds or more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response time is definitely a huge issue. That most of our software fails at&#8212;even our OPACs that DO have local indexes generally have ridiculously slow response times. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely an issue with broadcast search. I am trying to convince my fellow librarians at my place of work that if a particular resource being searched is so slow that it brings down the response time of the overall broadcast search, it should be dropped from the default search sets&#8211;no matter how useful it is. Tell the vendor to make it faster. They aren&#8217;t agreeing. </p>
<p>While the fastest broadcast search is still going to be slower than the fastest local index search, our current broadcast search is far from &#8216;the fastest&#8217;. I think broadcast search can probably be fast enough. Some sources in my broadcast search return in a couple seconds. Others take 10 seconds or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: art</title>
		<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator>art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibwild.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-2921</guid>
		<description>UBC takes a neat linking approach called &quot;OneSearch Links&quot;, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.library.ubc.ca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. As the parent of a 3rd year undergraduate with two more children poised to enter university, I don&#039;t think we can underestimate response time in defining a compelling search experience, I am constantly amazed by how often I hear everything the library offers is too slow, especially commercial databases. For better or for worse, google is often closer and faster to our user base than anything we provide. Broadcast searching, in particular, stumbles here, I often wish we could hammer out a common index format among our content and indexing suppliers, and use something like lucene as the basis for bringing together disparate indexes rather than introducing network latency into every interaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UBC takes a neat linking approach called &#8220;OneSearch Links&#8221;, see <a href="http://www.library.ubc.ca/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. As the parent of a 3rd year undergraduate with two more children poised to enter university, I don&#8217;t think we can underestimate response time in defining a compelling search experience, I am constantly amazed by how often I hear everything the library offers is too slow, especially commercial databases. For better or for worse, google is often closer and faster to our user base than anything we provide. Broadcast searching, in particular, stumbles here, I often wish we could hammer out a common index format among our content and indexing suppliers, and use something like lucene as the basis for bringing together disparate indexes rather than introducing network latency into every interaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantasizing about federated search &#187; Federated Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasizing about federated search &#187; Federated Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibwild.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>[...] Rochkind authors the Bibliographic Wilderness blog. Last Friday, Jonathan discussed some of the technical and other problems he saw with federated search today and he even created a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rochkind authors the Bibliographic Wilderness blog. Last Friday, Jonathan discussed some of the technical and other problems he saw with federated search today and he even created a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library search as ’search portal’&#8230;10.06.08 &#171; The Proverbial Lone Wolf Librarian&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Library search as ’search portal’&#8230;10.06.08 &#171; The Proverbial Lone Wolf Librarian&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibwild.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>[...] search as ’search&#160;portal’&#8230;10.06.08  6 10 2008   Interesting post [http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/] on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] search as ’search&nbsp;portal’&#8230;10.06.08  6 10 2008   Interesting post [http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/search-portal/] on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
