questionable quality of some online educational programs

Thrun—former Stanford superprofessor, Silicon Valley demigod, and now CEO of online-course purveyor Udacity—just admitted to Fast Company’s openly smitten Max Chafkin that his company’s courses are often a “lousy product.”

For Udacity’s catastrophic failure to teach remedial mathematics at San Jose State University, Thrun blames neither the corporatization of the university nor the MOOC’s use of unqualified “student mentors” in assessment. Instead, he blames the students themselves for being so damn poor.

The way Fast Company has it, Thrun chucks those San Jose State students under the self-driving Google car faster than he chugs up a hill on his custom-made road bike, leaving a panting Max Chafkin in the dust to ponder the following Thrunism: “These were students from difficult neighborhoods, without good access to computers, and with all kinds of challenges in their lives. … It’s a group for which this medium is not a good fit.”

The problem, of course, is that those students represent the precise group MOOCs are meant to serve. “MOOCs were supposed to be the device that would bring higher education to the masses,” Jonathan Rees noted. “However, the masses at San Jose State don’t appear to be ready for the commodified, impersonal higher education that MOOCs offer.”

The King of MOOCs Abdicates the Throne, Rebecca Schuman, slate.com

“I’d aspired to give people a profound education–to teach them something substantial,” Professor Sebastian Thrun tells me when I visit his company, Udacity, in its Mountain View, California, headquarters this past October. “But the data was at odds with this idea.”

As Thrun was being praised by Friedman, and pretty much everyone else, for having attracted a stunning number of students–1.6 million to date–he was obsessing over a data point that was rarely mentioned in the breathless accounts about the power of new forms of free online education: the shockingly low number of students who actually finish the classes, which is fewer than 10%. Not all of those people received a passing grade, either, meaning that for every 100 pupils who enrolled in a free course, something like five actually learned the topic. If this was an education revolution, it was a disturbingly uneven one.

“We were on the front pages of newspapers and magazines, and at the same time, I was realizing, we don’t educate people as others wished, or as I wished. We have a lousy product,” Thrun tells me. “It was a painful moment.” Turns out he doesn’t even like the term MOOC.

UDACITY’S SEBASTIAN THRUN, GODFATHER OF FREE ONLINE EDUCATION, CHANGES COURSE, Max Chafkin, FastCompany

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to questionable quality of some online educational programs

  1. Richard says:

    Actually this doesn’t overly surprise me. Although the free online education concept is great in theory, the reality is that if a student is not strongly motivated and fairly self-sufficient, then it is unlikely they will finish. Speaking as a former teacher myself, you see exactly the same attitude to learning in our face-to-face education systems. More than half of the work I did as a teacher was not teaching the material – it was teaching them how to learn, how to enjoy it, and how to be self-motivated. I believe that if they can somehow bring this experience into online education, then you will see an increase in the numbers of students completing and passing the course.

  2. jrochkind says:

    Many of us are, I’m sure, not surprised.

    The primary motivation for ‘online education’ at the moment seems to be ‘cost savings’. The promise of ‘MOOCs was cost savings via labor cost, by dramatically increasing the student/teacher ratio. I doubt you can ‘bring that experience’ into online education with the kinds of ‘labor savings’ that seem the goal.

    What do you know, the teacher-student relationship has educational benefit, who would have guessed it? One would think nearly anyone that’s been an effective teacher or an effective student.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s